Why has it come to this point?

Monday, September 29, 2008 at 08:05 (Election 2008, General Discussion)

The most important part of this article is the last two paragraphs:

“Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, an opponent, estimated that half of the House’s 199 Republicans are “truly undecided.”

Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said he was inclined to oppose the bill. But he added: “A lot of people are going to hold their nose and vote for it, because they’ve been put in a bad position and they don’t have any other option.”

The question comes up… how did the economy get this bad when we have checks and balances to prevent this. Since the depression, the government created various “windows” that would help the economy stay strong. How come we are at this point? Obviously this didn’t occur over night. Why weren’t the people in charge noticing the “red flags?” 

I’ve noticed a huge shift over the past two years.. possibly even the past four. I have never had to pay taxes because I’ve always claimed below what I’m supposed to… yet for the past three years, since I’ve been in school, I would have had to pay if I did not have the education tax credit. My state taxes have even been to the point where I only get a couple dollars, maybe up to $25. Yet, every check, I pay about 25% in taxes, insurance, and social security. 

Again, I do not see how it has come to this point were our government does not feel that they can vote against a bill, because it’s “the only option.” I don’t see how it came to be that our government let the situation fall to the last night before things fell to hell where a decision “must be made now.” That’s bad business and even worse legislation. 

This is for the Bush administration: Stop waiting till the last minute! The tax stimulus was bad enough… You have another 113 days to make a difference in this country. There are no parlor tricks that can bail you out… Fox News isn’t going to release some miracle into the air. Stop looking abroad, bring back the troops and focus “on the Family!” Focus on your country… not your pocket books!

Bush confident bailout bill will stabilize economy

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer9 minutes ago

Key supporters of a Wall Street bailout package prodded lawmakers to approve the plan hours ahead of a difficult House vote on Monday, with President Bush saying it is needed to “keep the crisis in our financial system from spreading throughout our economy.”

“Every member of Congress and every American should keep in mind that a vote for this bill is a vote to prevent economic damage to you and your community,” said Bush, fully aware that congressional passage of the $700 billion compromise legislation is far from assured.

“With this strong and decisive legislation,” he said, “we will help restart the flow of credit so American families can meet their daily needs and American businesses can make purchases, ship goods and meet their payrolls.”

The package cleared a key procedural hurdle on the House floor Monday morning with a 220-198 vote to move it to three hours of general debate and a final vote, likely by midday or early afternoon.

Two leading players in the negotiations also spoke early Monday, taking to television news shows to lobby for approval of a package deeply unpopular with a public angry that taxpayer money will save Wall Street firms from heavy risk-taking. Thousands of angry phone calls, e-mails and letters have poured into Capitol Hill from constituents.

But Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said that failure to act would spread the contagion of frozen credit markets even further. “This is not just about Wall Street,” said the Banking Committee chairman.

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., who represented fellow Republicans in the hard-fought 10 days of talks that culminated in a deal early Sunday morning, called it a “tourniquet” for the ailing financial industry and slow-moving economy.

Still, both men said the necessity of such massive government action is a sad day for the nation. Asked if the legislation, slated for a vote in the House later Monday and a Senate vote as early as Wednesday, would pass, Dodd said only: “We hope so.”

These players were speaking not just to rank-and-file lawmakers to whom the spotlight now turns in this contentious, dramatic debate, but to U.S. and global markets which have displayed nervousness about Washington’s determination to act.

Investors worldwide and in early trading in the United States continued to show doubt about whether the bill would go through, much less go a long way toward curing the systemic problems that have unnerved financial markets across the globe for weeks.

There was a further sign of general economic deterioration Monday as the Commerce Department reported that consumer spending was unchanged in August — even worse than the small 0.2 percent gain that economists had anticipated. It was the weakest showing since spending was also flat in February.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a statement Monday, said he welcomed agreement on a compromise bill.

“This legislation should help to restore the flow of credit to households and businesses that is essential for economic growth and job creation, while at the same time affording strong and necessary protections for taxpayers,” Bernanke said, calling for swift passage.

Bush said he “fully understands” the bailout bill is a difficult vote for lawmakers, and after his statement on the South Lawn he, and Vice President Dick Cheney, took to the phones to corral individual members of Congress.

But he argued that jittery U.S. taxpayers will benefit from a number of safeguards that lawmakers wrote into the pending legislation, including checks and balances on the operation of the program, curbs on “golden parachutes” for top executives of firms getting help, and assurances that taxpayers would ultimately be reimbursed by the companies for any losses. But the government would have broad discretion to decide how to implement both. The legislation also requires that the government take ownership stakes in companies that receive federal infusions, so it could share a piece of potential future profits.

Bush also said the ultimate cost of the bailout will be much less than the $700 billion authorized in the bill. The sour assets — mostly mortgage-backed securities — that the program allows the government to take off the books of struggling financial institutions will eventually be sold, perhaps even at a profit.

Still, the president hinted that this may not be the last intervention required.

“It’s been a volatile time for our financial system and our economy,” he said. “Even with the important steps we’re taking to address the current crisis, we will continue to face serious challenges.”

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson sought the unprecedented amount of money with little supervision.

Instead, the bill lets Congress block half the money and force the president to jump through some hoops before using it all. The government could get at $250 billion immediately, $100 billion more if the president certified it was necessary, and the last $350 billion with a separate certification — and subject to a congressional resolution of disapproval. Still, the resolution could be vetoed by the president, meaning it would take extra-large congressional majorities to stop it.

Banks, credit unions, securities brokers and dealers, and insurance companies, among others, could get the help as long as they had “significant operations” in the United States. Originally designed to help companies get rotten mortgage-related investments off their balance sheets, the legislation would allow the government to buy up any kind of asset top economic officials think is necessary to promote market stability.

The final 110-page bill was released Sunday evening after a final weekend of intense negotiating, and Republicans and Democrats huddled for hours in private meetings Sunday night to learn its details and voice their concerns. Many said they left uncertain of how they would vote.

Lawmakers in both parties who are facing re-election are particularly nervous about embracing such a costly plan proposed by a deeply unpopular president that would benefit perhaps the most publicly detested of all: companies that got rich off bad bets.

“Nobody wants to have to support this bill,” said Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the House minority leader. But he said he was urging “every member whose conscience will allow them to support this” to do so. Officials in both parties expected the vote to be a nail-biter.

The two major party presidential candidates — Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama — expressed tepid support for the bailout.

Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, an opponent, estimated that half of the House’s 199 Republicans are “truly undecided.”

Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said he was inclined to oppose the bill. But he added: “A lot of people are going to hold their nose and vote for it, because they’ve been put in a bad position and they don’t have any other option.”

Article pulled from Yahoo! News: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080929/ap_on_bi_ge/financial_meltdown

Permalink 1 Comment

Patterns… Not the TKD kind

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 10:37 (Personal development)

So… Through this next year I’m really trying to examine my habitual patterns. By examining, I can determine which are beneficial and which are not. Through this examination, I can find which patterns led to the current situation I’m in, most specifically school. I think some of them also speak to my financial and work situations as well.

The most obvious pattern that I’ve been able to pin point is my victimization. I’ve often taken the stance of being the victim. In the situation with school, I felt as though I was being targeted by the professors. I couldn’t explain why they were giving me such negative feedback, especially considering my extensive background in this field. I’m going to avoid going into the various examinations of the situation, as they justify and excuse the situation, furthering the victim role. This is neither beneficial, nor useful in this examination. Instead, I’m going to examine how I developed this pattern.

For various reasons, my siblings were taught and held the belief that I was unable to fend for myself. I was the baby, and my parents both worked. I was in day care longer than my brother and sister, and often rejected by my grandparents “due to my age” (as my parents often explained to me). I was constantly given excuses why people viewed me as helpless. Through that process, I developed a big mouth, often creating messes that I was unable to clean on my own (i.e. 3 eighth graders chasing me from the bus stop to my home), leaving either my brother or sister to clean it up. I can honestly say that my father’s irrelevant stance toward my education, unless I was getting C’s did not help. I did not receive praise or recognition for my good grades until I started in Taekwon-Do. Then I got positive incentive, as well as negative recognition when I didn’t meet the standard.

This process of negative attention being the primary source for nourishment from my family was potentially the primary catalist for this pattern; directly and indirectly. This directly effected me because I did not know how to gain attention from my family, feel their presence, or feel as though I was seen, heard and felt. It was the only way I could feel human. Often, especially after things took a turn for the worse (my mother had her second affair and my father lost his job, therefore losing the house, this happened between 3-4th grades). It was also around the time that my vision also began to deteriorate. The indirect effects are easier explained through the patterns of violence/aggression. When I was rejected, I began to have doubts about myself. through the excuses my parents gave for other’s lack of ability, and my “rambuntiousness, hyperactivity, and aggression” they were unable to care for me. This developed ideas that I was not good as who I am. Therefore, I began making excuses for myself…and other people.

This effectlvely leads into my pattern of being the caretaker, which is a passive way of victimizing ourselves. I often find myself over-extending my resources by helping others, agreeing to take shifts that I either don’t want or don’t have the ability to take on. This pattern was developed around the time I was eight years old. My father came home in a rage about my mother, threatening to kill her. I didn’t know what was going on, but I loved my mother and didn’t want my father to kill her. I was afraid of my father, because he was reactive, and very aggressive. He had often spanked us (so did our mom), and threatened to lock us in our rooms, leave us places, or various other things that I think he got from the army, but also from his parents. Even though I was afraid of him, I was more afraid for my mother. Again, I didn’t know what she was doing to make him mad, but I didn’t think it warranted her death (I still don’t, but that’s beside the point). I then became my mother’s surrogate spouse; a term defined I believe by Virginia Satyr (or someone else before her) as a child that takes on the emotional or “spiritual” role of the parents partner, often acting as an intermediary or confidant. Many times I’d console my mother, talk to her… or listen about her problems with my father. That was when I first learned to be a counselor. However, you should never provide therapy to your family members, especially as a child. All I wanted to do was see my mom happy; then I believed that things were not “good” when not everyone was happy. I didn’t think my father had the capacity to be happy… but I also didn’t see his pain and suffering, nor did I want to see it.

The third pattern, and the last one I’ll discuss today, has to do with follow through. The first major choice I failed to follow through with was theater. My senior year of high school, everyone believed I was going to go into theater. My father constantly tried to talk me out of it, because there wasn’t any money in it, and he didn’t feel I was good enough to succeed. My mom held similar views, but didn’t express them as openly; I think it was more passive aggressive (another pattern I’ve developed). After some serious rejections from some of the top theater schools (i graduated with a 3.8 and scored a pretty decent score on the ACT’s), I fell into a slump. I didn’t want to go to the local Community college as my brother and mother had done, and I didn’t feel as though I would be very successful in theater. About a year into my AA, (after finding a way to get in), I decided to change my major. I didn’t want to do the work to succeed in theater, even though I was really good. I don’t think I was strong enough to deal with the rejection, and from hearing from my family and teachers that I wasn’t good enough (my hs choir teacher actually told me I sing better when I’m sick) for several years, I decided it wasn’t my life. I didn’t realize, at that time, that college was much different than high school and the professors actually wanted you to succeed… and encouraged failure as a developmental tool. (can you hear the victimization?… oi!). Anyway, I opted to major in Psychology because I wanted to solve the problems of my family. I wanted to figure it out. I wanted to crack the code. I wanted to evolve.

At that time, the only thing I’d really stuck with for longer than a few years was Taekwon-Do. I didn’t participate in sports, and the best thing I did for my body was ride my bike; that was until I got a car and pretty much drove everywhere. However, I was still going to Taekwon-Do. Even that required a lot of perseverance. When I was going through the Blue/Red belt transitions, and being thrown back to the back of the class, I spent several months not going to class… but instead playing in the back room with another classmate (who never got past his red belt by the way). After missing a couple tests due to my absences, my instructor talked to me about my attendance. He then had me start assisting him with the junior class (white through green belt). He had me stand in as the high ranking senior, to give the the feelings of authority and recognition that I was seeking, but also giving me something to occupy my time, because I often came early anyway to get out of the house.

Hmm… I never really looked at it that way.

So, these three patterns: victimization, caretaking and quitting, have been quite effective in stagnating my life, putting myself in difficult positions, and not recognizing when I need help. I also don’t often see how I need help to ask for it. Lately, especially over the past few weeks, I’ve been asking for help more frequently. I see these patterns as habitual in my life, and I’m working at correcting them or seeing how I can make them helpful. There is wisdom in their application, but ultimately, they are the undeveloped resources of a child, and are unsuitable for an adult. They do have their applications, but not as a primary defense mechanism for living in the world.

There are times when we do play the victim role, and we have to discover how to do it with dignity, respect, and understanding of both our position and the position of those who abuse us. That’s why I’m examining the role I played in my relationship with LW. Being a caretaker definitely has its benefits, both in the field of psychology and theater. There are times when we are going to need to advocate for our clients, and it’s going to have to occur spontaneously, and without reservation. There are also several missed opportunities in the theater when we don’t step in to take care of someone or something (for example in Phantom of the Opera, Christine often practiced the lead roles, and because she did, she was noticed and suggested for the role by her friend). Lastly, quitting. It’s important to know the difference between quitting, taking a different route and not doing those things.

The most significant example of this dynamic occurs with the element of wind. Wind is everywhere and occurs around and within everything. It facilitates in the movement of water, it can often propel us along our path, or it can provide resistance, informing us to slow down and take it easy. However, the wind constantly makes a choice when it comes across an obstacle. Sometimes, it moves around it, creating a swirl, up (and down) draft, and creating more weather (this would be a redirection/avoidance). Sometimes it changes direction completely, shifting the momentum quickly and effortlessly (I would term this quitting). Other times, the wind picks up energy and blows through the object, sometimes destroying, but always changing the object (forcing a change in balance/counter-balance, encouraging development for more reliable material, etc). Each of these “choices” causes a significantly different result. As we have witnessed this past year with the several hurricanes that have affected the United States this past year, we have changed how we view nature, community, family and preparation.

I will continue to work on the resolution of these patterns while also seeking more patterns. Through the process of examination, reflection and analysis, I hope to determine which are helping me, and which are ultimately unhealthy in their current expression. Regardless, there was a reason I adopted them, and although they may be prohibiting my development, they also kept me alive through the past 30 years.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Quote

Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 01:40 (General Discussion)

From an email my mom sent me:

Whatever you give a woman, she’s going to multiply it. If you give her
sperm, she’ll give you a baby. If you give her a house, she’ll give you a
home. If you give her groceries, she’ll give you a meal. If you give her a
smile, she’ll give you her heart. She multiplies and enlarges what is given
to her.’  So – if you give her crap, you will receive more shit than any one
human being can handle  Love and appreciate all the women in your life

Permalink Leave a Comment

The Zodiac Signs

Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 10:27 (Personality Theory)

The Western Zodiac, as i have come to learn, is one of the most modern versions of the zodiac to date. Throughout the years, it has evolved, but traditionally comes from Greek philosophers and scientists (Sharp, 2005). As planets and stars were discovered and identified, they were added into the mix. At the time of completion there were nine known planets and two celestial entities that also affected the zodiac charts. These celestial entities will be discussed later.

There are twelve signs in the Zodiac (Western will be implied from this point, unless something else is specifically mentioned), each represented by various constellations, ruled by specific celestial entities (often referred to as planets, including the sun and moon), characterized by certain of the four cardinal elements and having one of three groups of characteristics. When reading this, it sounded very complicated. Isn’t it just, “I am a Capricorn, therefore, I’m stubborn, providing, conservative, agile, but slow-minded, sometimes aggressive, yet very grounded” (based upon knowledge assessed on the idea that Capricorn is the sign of the goat, sometimes equated with the Pagan Horned-God, and is associated with the new year).

There is much more to the Zodiac than just one sign. First of all, each person has some aspects of the twelve signs. These aspects are called houses. There are dominant aspects, such as the “Ascendent” sign, which was associated with our past lives, predestined characteristics, and absolution’s. This sign depends on the time and location of birth. Each subsequent sign follows suite in chronological order. Still, this neglects the specific meaning of each individual sign.

These will be discussed at a later date, when I can determine the relevance of the individual signs and my theories.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Twenty worst drinks

Friday, September 19, 2008 at 11:06 (General Discussion)

This is from a website I stumbled across while reading my morning Yahoo! news: http://www.menshealth.com/eatthis/Unhealthiest_Drinks_in_America/1_The_Worst_Drink_in_America.php

1. The Worst Drink in America

Baskin-Robbins Large Heath Bar Shake

2,310 calories
108 g fat (64 g saturated)
266 g

Let’s look at America’s Worst Drink in numbers:

73: The number of ingredients that go into this milkshake.
66: The number of teaspoons of sugar this drink contains.
11: The number of Heath Bars you would have to eat to equal the number of calories found in one Baskin Robbins Large Heath Bar Shake.
12: The average number of minutes it takes to consume this drink.
240: The number of minutes you’d need to spend on a treadmill, running at a moderate pace, to burn it off.

Other cool links and news:

America’s Worst Breakfast Foods Posted Wed, Sep 17, 2008, 11:50 am PDT

It’s hard to overestimate the importance of eating breakfast. Studies show that people who take time for a morning meal consume fewer calories over the course of the day, have stronger cognitive skills, and are 30 percent less likely to be overweight or obese. Beyond that, people who skip breakfast are more likely to drink alcohol and smoke, and they’re less likely to exercise.

But just because breakfast is the most important meal of the day doesn’t grant you permission to go into a feeding frenzy. But that’s exactly what many of the country’s most popular breakfast joints are setting you up for, by peddling fatty scrambles, misguided muffins, and pancakes that look like manhole covers.

These foods are loaded with unhealthy fats, added sugars, and refined carbohydrates, which catapult your blood sugar, sap your energy levels, and tell your body to store fat.

To help you avoid the morning mishaps, we searched out the good, the bad, and the greasy, and uncovered some of the worst breakfast foods in America. We’ve presented a sampling of the worst offenders below. It’s like a lineup down at the local police station, except in this case, they’re all guilty as charged.

Worst Side Dish
Burger King Hash Browns (large)
620 calories
40 g fat (11 g saturated; 13 g trans)
1,200 mg sodium
60 g carbs

Yes, you’re ingesting more than a meal’s worth of calories from a side dish, but the real cause for concern here is that these little potato cakes pack seven times more trans fats than you’re supposed to eat all day! Until BK learns to cut out the partially hydrogenated oils, avoid encounters with potatoes of any kind at that fatty food joint.

Eat This Instead!
Burger King Egg & Cheese Croissan’wich
300 calories
17 g fat (6 g saturated; 2 g trans)
740 mg sodium
26 g carbs

Worst Breakfast Sandwich
Hardee’s Monster Biscuit
710 calories
51 g fat (17 g saturated)
2,250 mg sodium
37 g carbohydrates

When they say “Monster,” they mean it. This 700-calorie behemoth should be enough to scare anyone: It contains nearly a full day’s worth of sodium and saturated fat. Instead try the Sunrise Croissant with Bacon. It’s not exactly diet-friendly, but if you’re stuck at Hardee’s, it’s a way to escape without too much damage.

Eat This Instead!
Hardee’s Sunrise Croissant with Bacon
450 calories
29 g fat (12 g saturated)
900 mg sodium
28 g carbs

Worst Kids Meal
Denny’s Big Dipper French Toastix with margarine and syrup
770 calories
71 g fat (13 g saturated)
107 g carbs

As important as it is for mom and dad to eat a good breakfast each morning, it’s even more critical that their kids do. After all, breakfast affects their energy levels, metabolism, and performance in school. Better think twice before feeding them these dubious little sticks. For more healthy kids’ choices, check out Eat This, Not That! for Kids.

Eat This Instead!
Kid’s D-Zone Smiley Alien Hotcakes
340 calories
12 g fat (5 g saturated)
49 g carbs

Worst Pastry
Cinnabon Classic Cinnamon Roll
813 calories
32 g fat (5 g trans fat)
117 g carbs

You wouldn’t start your day with three brownies, would you? As far as your body knows, that’s exactly what you’ll be doing if you wake up with this cinnamon-swirled disaster area. In fact, because Cinnabon offers no healthy alternatives, you’ll have to  invite friends (or enemies?) to share the risky roll, or steer clear of Cinnabon altogether.

Worst Smoothie
Smoothie King Grape Expectations II (40 oz.)
1,102 calories
256 g sugars
740 mg sodium

Why Smoothie King would even offer a 40 oz. serving size is beyond us. With more than half the calories you need in a day and the sugar equivalent of 12 Haagen Dasz ice cream bars, this “drink” should be renamed “diabetes in a glass.” Just goes to show you the importance of drinking responsibly.

Drink This Instead!
Smoothie King Low Carb Strawberry Smoothie (20 oz.)
268 calories
3 g sugars
176 mg sodium

Worst Combo Meal
McDonald’s Deluxe Breakfast
1,360 calories
64 g fat (22 g saturated)
2,325 mg sodium
160 g carbs
49 g sugars

With four vehicles for refined carbohydrates (biscuit, hash browns, hotcakes, syrup), this “deluxe” disaster will send your blood sugar soaring. Why blow nearly an entire day’s calories under the arches, when a perfectly satisfying Egg McMuffin will save you more than 1,000 calories?

Eat This Instead!
McDonald’s Egg McMuffin with coffee
310 calories
12 g fat (5 g saturated)
820 mg sodium
30 g carbs
3 g sugars

Worst Omelet
IHOP Big Steak Omelet
1,490 calories
(No additional nutrition information available)

IHOP doesn’t provide nutritional information aside from calorie counts, but with a boatload of steak, a bucket of cheese, and handfuls of hash browns, this omelet’s fat and sodium numbers are surely just as appalling.

Eat This Instead!
IHOP For Me Garden Scramble
440 calories

The Worst Breakfast in America
Bob Evans Stacked and Stuffed Caramel Banana Pecan Hotcakes
1,543 calories
77 g fat (26 g saturated; 9 g trans)
2,259 mg sodium
198 g carbs
109 g sugars

It’s not a good sign when it takes you nearly five seconds to spit out the name of your breakfast. This bad boy packs in more than 75 percent of your calories for the day, along with more sugar and fat than nine glazed Dunkin’ Donuts, and nearly as much sodium as five Bloody Marys.

Eat This Instead!
3 Scrambled Egg Beaters with 2 slices of bacon and fresh fruit
314 calories
19.5 g fat (5 g saturated)
700 mg sodium
21 g carbs
18 g sugars

To steer clear of the quickest way to pack on pounds — by sipping them through a straw — check out the 20 Unhealthiest Drinks in America.

And see how all of these restaurants (and 34 others of your favorites!) stack up nutritionally by checking out our definitive Restaurant Report Card.

Have your own big offenders — and secrets for protecting your waistline? Share them with the rest of us here.

The nice thing about Men’s Health, they also tell you what you should be eating instead.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »